<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wikidot="http://www.wikidot.com/rss-namespace">

	<channel>
		<title>Asset Lives (new posts)</title>
		<link>http://lgam.wikidot.com/forum/c-68018/asset-lives</link>
		<description>Posts in the forum category &quot;Asset Lives&quot; - Post any comments or questions about asset lives here.</description>
				<copyright></copyright>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 14:02:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
					<item>
				<guid>http://lgam.wikidot.com/forum/t-262123#post-862878</guid>
				<title>Estimated Useful Life of Motor Vehicles: Re: Estimated Useful Life of Motor Vehicles</title>
				<link>http://lgam.wikidot.com/forum/t-262123/estimated-useful-life-of-motor-vehicles#post-862878</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 04:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Wayne Eddy</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>220040</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Hi, Sammy,</p> <p>I don't think it is common to measure a vehicles useful life in kilometres. I know that many Councils have policies about when a vehicle is traded in that are tied to kilometres, but this isn't necessarily the same as useful life.</p> <p>At Bundaberg I believe we adopt a range of useful lives for vehicles depending on the make and model and a number of other considerations, including resale value etc.</p> <p>I also understand that our fleet guys sometimes use the following site when trying to determine useful lives, etc.</p> <p><a href="http://www.redbook.com.au">http://www.redbook.com.au</a></p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://lgam.wikidot.com/forum/t-262123#post-861932</guid>
				<title>Estimated Useful Life of Motor Vehicles: Estimated Useful Life of Motor Vehicles</title>
				<link>http://lgam.wikidot.com/forum/t-262123/estimated-useful-life-of-motor-vehicles#post-861932</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 03:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>SammyJ76</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>554235</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Hi Everyone</p> <p>This is my first post!</p> <p>Does anyone know if there is a standard or benchmark for estimated the expected useful life of a motor vehicle in kilometres.</p> <p>I need to calculate the remaining life of a second hand vehicle and was hoping to use the odometer reading.</p> <p>Any ideas?</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://lgam.wikidot.com/forum/t-258228#post-847495</guid>
				<title>Estimating the Useful Lives of Long-Lived Assets: Estimating the Useful Lives of Long-Lived Assets</title>
				<link>http://lgam.wikidot.com/forum/t-258228/estimating-the-useful-lives-of-long-lived-assets#post-847495</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 05:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Wayne Eddy</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>220040</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>I have been thinking a bit lately about how best to determine a realistic <a href="http://lgam.wikidot.com/useful-life">useful life</a> for long-lived assets and I believe that I have come up with a clever methodology for<br /> a) assigning realistic, locally applicable useful lives to assets of a given type<br /> b) estimating a realistic <a href="http://lgam.wikidot.com/remaining-useful-life">remaining useful life</a> for assets if its condition score is known.</p> <p>It requires that condition surveys of a reasonable sized sample of assets has been conducted on two occasions.</p> <p>I have explained the methodology using dummy data here<br /> <a href="http://brc-amps.wikidot.com/road-pavement-useful-life">http://brc-amps.wikidot.com/road-pavement-useful-life</a></p> <p>But I would like to try it out on some real data.</p> <p>If anybody would be willing to provide me with some real data, I would only be to pleased to run the analysis on it too see what I come up with.</p> <p>Anyone interested?</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://lgam.wikidot.com/forum/t-112331#post-332799</guid>
				<title>Gravel Resheets: Re: Gravel Resheets</title>
				<link>http://lgam.wikidot.com/forum/t-112331/gravel-resheets#post-332799</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 23:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>darronlpasslow</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>230075</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>In response to your gravel resheet question, at WSC;<br /> Gravel resheet is a capital expenditure and is renewal. It is not maintenance (unless it falls below agreed, approved threshold).</p> <p>WSC uses varying economic life (typical) based on rural or urban unsealed roads.<br /> WSC uses thicker resheeting for urban than rural and consequently different lives.<br /> Rural unsealed surface - 15 years<br /> Urban unsealed surface (thicker surface) - 20 years.</p> <p>Also note the very good article from Andrew Wilson at Salisbury (Asset Capitalisation Policy)<br /> A very relevant document (that with Andrew's permission should be posted for all to see).<br /> This covers Maintenance vs Capital (Renewal/Upgrade/New) and appropriate thresholds.</p> <p>A good lesson for us all.<br /> Well done Andrew.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://lgam.wikidot.com/forum/t-112331#post-332116</guid>
				<title>Gravel Resheets: Gravel Resheets</title>
				<link>http://lgam.wikidot.com/forum/t-112331/gravel-resheets#post-332116</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 05:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Wayne Eddy</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>220040</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>I am interested to learn what a range of Councils consider to be a typical life for a <a href="http://lgam.wikidot.com/gravel-resheet">Gravel Resheet</a>?<br /> Also, I am of the opinion the a gravel resheet is a <a href="http://lgam.wikidot.com/renewal">renewal</a> and therefore capital in nature, but I have heard that some Councils consider them to be <a href="http://lgam.wikidot.com/maintenance">maintenance</a>, so any comments about that would be appreciated too.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
				</channel>
</rss>