<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wikidot="http://www.wikidot.com/rss-namespace">

	<channel>
		<title>$25 million Local Government Reform Fund</title>
		<link>http://www.lgam.info/forum/t-165517/25-million-local-government-reform-fund</link>
		<description>Posts in the discussion thread &quot;$25 million Local Government Reform Fund&quot;</description>
				<copyright></copyright>
		<lastBuildDate></lastBuildDate>
		
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.lgam.info/forum/t-165517#post-521383</guid>
				<title>Re: $25 million Local Government Reform Fund</title>
				<link>http://www.lgam.info/forum/t-165517/25-million-local-government-reform-fund#post-521383</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 07:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>darronlpasslow</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>230075</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>I have also been thinking about how we can take advantage of this LG Reform Fund.<br /> Is there any indication of who will administer it and who will approve projects and how projects should be presented?<br /> In the debate surrounding the National Asset Management Framework and its subset in NSW - Integrated Planning and Reporting which includes Asset Management Planning &amp; Reporting (as a key component), I have already recommended (at State level) that a few good, representative Councils should be chosen and they should attract significant funding to pioneer Good Asset Management Practice ('GAMP') in Local Governement - this would include (as you suggest) building appropriate templates and systems and checking out their applicability and functionality - completely documenting the procedures, practies and policies involved. A few leading lights with the where-for-all and the initiative to move forward at an appropriate pace (fast-track) and bring the rest along with them.<br /> I saw the need for several participants across various Council sizes (e.g. large, medium, small) as requirements and capabilities differ significantly based on size and revenue base.<br /> I saw Wingecarribee being an example of a medium sized Council (350 staff, 40,000 residents) and certainly with the entrepreneurial spirit to take a project like this forward with gusto. However I also saw the need for this to be a competitive process where the best team/Councils get the guernseys, once they have agreed to basic T&amp;C including sharing/publishing the findings.</p> <p>I am happy to start this initiative again. I am happy to work with others (of similar size). I am happy to be involved but would need a good reason (financial and technical) to take this initiative to the executive team here at WSC.<br /> I am open to suggestions.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.lgam.info/forum/t-165517#post-521089</guid>
				<title>Re: $25 million Local Government Reform Fund</title>
				<link>http://www.lgam.info/forum/t-165517/25-million-local-government-reform-fund#post-521089</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 23:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Wayne Eddy</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>220040</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>I've had a bit of a think about the above over the weekend, and I am going to try and write a submission advocating that the money be spent in a way that optimises the benefits to Councils, and doesn't just end up in the pockets of consultants and industry groups. Here is what I've got so far.</p> <p>The National Asset Management Framework should incorporate;</p> <ul> <li>Open standards for asset registers, that clearly specify naming conventions, table structures, etc. The standards should take into account all State &amp; Federal Government reporting requirements, and ensure that data can be easily imported and exported between compliant Asset Management Software Systems.</li> <li>Free, open &amp; universally accessible Asset Management Plan templates for all asset classes.</li> <li>Free, open &amp; universally accessible Asset Management Manuals. These should not be PDF copies of word documents, they should be constantly updated web based versions, suitably indexed &amp; hyper-linked to make it easy for Council Staff to find information quickly.</li> <li>Support for the development of an open source asset management system capable of delivering a minimum level of asset management functionality.</li> </ul> <p>Data collection and analysis.</p> <ul> <li>All raw data collected should be published in an open format and made freely accessible to all interested parties.</li> </ul> <p>The support for collaboration between Councils should include;</p> <ul> <li>a Federal Government hosted or supported suite of web 2.0 collaboration tools, including wikis, social networks &amp; wave servers.</li> <li>education about the advantages of using Creative Commons licensing in Local Government.</li> </ul> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.lgam.info/forum/t-165517#post-520102</guid>
				<title>$25 million Local Government Reform Fund</title>
				<link>http://www.lgam.info/forum/t-165517/25-million-local-government-reform-fund#post-520102</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 09:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Wayne Eddy</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>220040</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>At the June 2009 Plenary Meeting of the <a href="http://www.lgam.info/australian-council-of-local-government">Australian Council of Local Government</a> a $25 million Local Government Reform Fund was announced.</p> <p>The <a href="http://www.pm.gov.au/media/Release/2009/media_release_1093.cfm">media release</a> states that:</p> <p>Over two years, the $25 million Local Government Reform Fund will:</p> <p>* Assist councils implement new asset management and planning consistent with a national framework;<br /> * Fund the collection and analysis of robust data about councils’ infrastructure assets; and<br /> * Support collaboration between councils on a regional basis for service delivery and planning.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
				</channel>
</rss>