<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wikidot="http://www.wikidot.com/rss-namespace">

	<channel>
		<title>Timber Bridge, Insurance</title>
		<link>http://lgam.wikidot.com/forum/t-277195/timber-bridge-insurance</link>
		<description>Posts in the discussion thread &quot;Timber Bridge, Insurance&quot; - Any experience or thoughts on insuring timber bridges ?</description>
				<copyright></copyright>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 21:51:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
					<item>
				<guid>http://lgam.wikidot.com/forum/t-277195#post-904009</guid>
				<title>Timber Bridge, Insurance</title>
				<link>http://lgam.wikidot.com/forum/t-277195/timber-bridge-insurance#post-904009</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 02:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Ashish Shah</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>362721</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>A small fire (and related damage) at one of our timber bridge make us close the bridge (it was 2 tonne due to its very poor condition anyways) opened up this discussions again.</p> <p>I would appreciate, if any one has gone pass insurance aspects for the Timber bridges?</p> <p>Some of the points:<br /> - The replacement cost (new one may not be timber bridge) and to upgrade it to new requirements etc make it difficult to come up with &quot;insurable market value&quot;<br /> - Replacement may trigger realignment in rural area<br /> - The excess might be high for incidental damage (such as we have for fire or even due to flood)<br /> - Natural disaster funding (due to complete flood washout and bush fires)<br /> - Damage due to heavy vehicle (e.g. overloaded etc) is covered under motor vehicle third party damage</p> <p>Regards,<br /> Ashish</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
				</channel>
</rss>