<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wikidot="http://www.wikidot.com/rss-namespace">

	<channel>
		<title>Asset Value for Money</title>
		<link>http://lgam.wikidot.com/forum/t-434313/asset-value-for-money</link>
		<description>Posts in the discussion thread &quot;Asset Value for Money&quot;</description>
				<copyright></copyright>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 16:50:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
					<item>
				<guid>http://lgam.wikidot.com/forum/t-434313#post-1353117</guid>
				<title>Asset Value for Money</title>
				<link>http://lgam.wikidot.com/forum/t-434313/asset-value-for-money#post-1353117</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 02:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Wayne Eddy</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>220040</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p><a href="http://lgam.wikidot.com/local-government-victoria">Local Government Victoria</a>'s <a href="http://lgam.wikidot.com/sustaining-local-assets-policy">Sustaining Local Assets Policy</a> requires that an <a href="http://lgam.wikidot.com/asset-management-plan">Asset Management Plan</a> justify the contribution of each asset in terms of value for money for the council.</p> <p>This seems like a pretty tricky requirement to satisfy to me.</p> <p>Can anyone out there share if &amp; how they managed to satisfy it?</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
				</channel>
</rss>